WASHINGTONJUSTICE.ORG
  • Education
  • Resources
  • Membership
  • Amicus
  • About Us
  • For The Public
  • Update My Profile
  • List Servers
  • EAGLE Exchange
  • Calendar
  •   
  • Education
    • Upcoming Seminars
    • On-Demand Seminars
    • Live Webinars
    • My Online Programs
    • CLE Materials/Recording
    • Deskbooks
    • Convention
    • Exhibit & Sponsorship
  • Resources
    • Calendar
    • New Member Resources
    • Listserves
    • Trial News
    • Expert/Litigation Services Directory
    • Eagle Document Exchange
    • Eagle Case Spotlight
    • Eagle CLE Materials/Publications
    • Making Good Law
    • Store
    • Job Bank
    • Classifieds
    • Member Directory
    • Justice Blogs
    • Lawyers Association Trust
  • Membership
    • Join
    • Eagle Program
  •  
  • Amicus
    • Cases
    • Amicus Search
    • Donate
    • Foundation Board/Amicus Committee
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Leadership
    • Awards
    • Staff & Office Locations
  • For The Public
 
  LOGIN  
  JOIN  
  • Now viewing:
  • CLE Catalog /
  • Self-Paced Online Seminars \
  • Paul Arons
  • Live Webinars
  • Self-Paced Online
  • Title Library
  • My History
  • FAQ
  1. Browse all programs by:
  2. Home
  3. Subject
  4. Presenter
  5. Credit
  6. Publisher
  7. Date Published

1 Program with Paul Arons

Paul Arons operates a law office in Friday Harbor, Washington. He began his legal career representing plaintiffs in labor and employment law disputes in the San Francisco Bay Area. In the early 1990’s, he began focusing on class actions under the FDCPA, challenging the practices of high volume check collectors. Since being admitted to practice in Washington, he has continued to represent plaintiffs pursuing debt collectors under the FDCPA and the Consumer Protection Act. Paul has co-counseled class actions throughout the Northwest. Representative cases include Schwarm v. Craighead, 552 F.Supp. 2d 1056 (E.D. Cal. 2008), (in which the court held that “check diversion programs”, are covered by the FDCPA), Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Servs., Inc., 560 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. Cal. 2009), (holding that a district court has discretion to shift class notice costs to the defendant once liability has been established), and Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. Hunt, 47 Cal. 4th 381 (Cal. 2009), [97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 464]., limiting the fees a debt collector could demand on a dishonored check, and Del Campo v. Am. Corrective Counseling Serv., 718 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (N.D. Cal. 2010), applying the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to “district attorney bad check diversion” companies.

  • Jump to:
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • ALL
 
Essential Tools to Build a Successful Plaintiff Consumer Protection Law Practice

Published by Washington State Association for Justice


Credit: WA

Details & Pricing

Powered by

Powered by SeminarWeb.com

Washington State Association for Justice

  SEATTLE  |   OLYMPIA  |  SPOKANE

 

    WSAJ@washingtonjustice.org

    (206) 464-1011